[Freeswitch-users] UPnP Timeout
Rupa Schomaker
rupa at rupa.com
Tue Feb 9 02:07:24 PST 2010
I believe FS opens the ports with an indefinite timeout (never close). I'd
have to double check. In addition, FS refreshes the NAT mappings on every
keep-alive packet sent by the upnp gateway. Have you done a nat_map status
once the ports are missing in pfsense to see if fs still thinks the ports
should be open? What if you do a nat_map republish? Do the maps get pushed
to pfsense and then stay open for a whlie?
Perhaps pfsense is sending a keep-alive packet that we don't process right
or is invalid? If so, I'd need a packet trace to do analysis.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Troy Anderson <troy at tlainvestments.com>wrote:
> I have been using pfSense (1.2.3) and FS. FS nicely uses UPnP to poke
> holes in the firewall, but it seems that the holes close after a while. I
> cannot find any documentation in FS nor in pfSense as to what the timeout
> is. Is there a setting in FS to do some kind of keep-alive thing with UPnP
> to keep, e.g. 5060, open? Or is it already doing that and pfSense is the
> issue?
>
> Thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
--
-Rupa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100209/ae52bf49/attachment-0002.html
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list