[Freeswitch-users] Reliability of HEARTBEAT events every 20 seconds? (in mod_event_socket)

[DJB International]

Are you running FS with -nocal?

-djbinter

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Peter Olsson <
peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se> wrote:

> Ok - I trapped the problem with full event info. The up-time also reports a
> difference, in this case 32 seconds. As you can see there is no load on the
> server at all by this time, no calls etc. Hmm, this is really strange I must
> say.
>
> [2010-12-09 13:53:49] Received HEARTBEAT event - we're alive
> content-length == 629
> content-type == text/event-plain
> core-uuid == 1550f368-b577-4304-bacd-2681d4067036
> event-calling-file == switch_core.c
> event-calling-function == send_heartbeat
> event-calling-line-number == 65
> event-date-gmt == Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:53:53 GMT
> event-date-local == 2010-12-09 13:53:53
> event-date-timestamp == 1291899233256303
> event-info == System Ready
> event-name == HEARTBEAT
> freeswitch-hostname == 79w3sipt4
> freeswitch-ipv4 == 10.66.195.14
> freeswitch-ipv6 == ::1
> idle-cpu == 98.437500
> session-count == 0
> session-per-sec == 30
> session-since-startup == 277
> up-time == 0 years, 7 days, 1 hour, 1 minute, 1 second, 680 milliseconds,
> 750 microseconds
>
> [2010-12-09 13:54:21] Received HEARTBEAT event - we're alive
> content-length == 631
> content-type == text/event-plain
> core-uuid == 1550f368-b577-4304-bacd-2681d4067036
> event-calling-file == switch_core.c
> event-calling-function == send_heartbeat
> event-calling-line-number == 65
> event-date-gmt == Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:54:25 GMT
> event-date-local == 2010-12-09 13:54:25
> event-date-timestamp == 1291899265259303
> event-info == System Ready
> event-name == HEARTBEAT
> freeswitch-hostname == 79w3sipt4
> freeswitch-ipv4 == 10.66.195.14
> freeswitch-ipv6 == ::1
> idle-cpu == 97.656250
> session-count == 0
> session-per-sec == 30
> session-since-startup == 277
> up-time == 0 years, 7 days, 1 hour, 1 minute, 33 seconds, 683 milliseconds,
> 750 microseconds
>
> Mvh
> Peter Olsson
>
>
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:
> freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] För Steven Ayre
> Skickat: den 9 december 2010 12:42
> Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help
> Ämne: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Reliability of HEARTBEAT events every 20
> seconds? (in mod_event_socket)
>
> Also do you have any warning messages like this in the fs log?
> Task was executed late by %d seconds
>
> (That should show up if the delay is in the scheduler, if the task
> runs >1s  late).
>
> -Steve
>
>
> On 9 December 2010 11:27, Peter Olsson <peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se>
> wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> >
> >
> > I have a question about the reliability of heartbeat events, it should be
> > sent from FreeSWITCH every 20 seconds - right? If you look below in my
> log
> > sample (from my own process), you can see that it comes 12:07:01, then
> 21,
> > then 41, but after this it suddenly takes 31 seconds for it to show up
> > (12:08:12). I've also done a Wireshark trace, and it shows the same thing
> -
> > so it is really delayed from FS. The load at the time was zero calls, and
> > the server itself was using maybe 5% CPU. After the delayed event it
> > continues to show up every 20 seconds.
> >
> >
> >
> > [2010-12-09 12:07:01] Received HEARTBEAT event - we're alive.
> >
> > [2010-12-09 12:07:21] Received HEARTBEAT event - we're alive.
> >
> > [2010-12-09 12:07:41] Received HEARTBEAT event - we're alive.
> >
> > [2010-12-09 12:08:12] Received HEARTBEAT event - we're alive.
> >
> > [2010-12-09 12:08:32] Received HEARTBEAT event - we're alive.
> >
> > [2010-12-09 12:08:52] Received HEARTBEAT event - we're alive.
> >
> > [2010-12-09 12:09:12] Received HEARTBEAT event - we're alive.
> >
> >
> >
> > Should the HEARTBEAT event be 100% reliable, or could something cause a
> > delay like this? This server is not on latest GIT, but it's not more then
> > one month old. I can debug this further myself, but I just want to know
> if
> > it always should be triggered every 20 seconds, or if these events for
> some
> > reasons might be delayed.
> >
> >
> >
> > By the way - no clock skew or anything is detected on the machine, so
> that's
> > not causing it.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > http://www.freeswitch.org
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
> !DSPAM:4d00c1a432762107714629!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20101209/1ffe0a4b/attachment-0001.html