[Freeswitch-users] scalability of FS vs yate

[Meftah Tayeb]

hi,
fs is much stable
fs is doing patch of the used library and sending it to the upstream project
fs is maintaining there own patch of the library
fs have very gradfull voicemail
fs have big conferencing module that never dead or give bad audio quality
fs have nice xml configuration base that's easy to understand/extand
the dialplan of freeswitch couldn't by found elsehere
fs have HD/WB/NB audio including polycom siren aka G.722.1, celt, silk, 
G.722, speex-WB
freeswitch could host 1000000000 of subscribers if you twick your RDBMS 
and your hardware and you load balance it through ODBC or opensips/kamailio
thanks
Le 21/08/2010 02:30, jesse zhao a écrit :
> I am wondering whether someone did testing of FreeSwitch vs Yate under
> the same hardware system and testing profiles. Which one is more
> scalable?
>
> Any usage case of FS in large service providers or organization in
> terms of 100K subscribers? It is nice to list customers of FS in the
> wiki page.
>
>
> thanks!
>
> -jesse
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>    


-- 
Meftah Tayeb
algérie télécom SPA
phone: +21321761805
phone (INUM): +883510001289101
mobile : +213660347746
mobile (INUM: +883510001289110
http://www.algerietelecom.dz