[Freeswitch-users] scalability of FS vs yate

[Nyamul Hassan]

Hi,

Depends on what you use it for, FS / Yate can be used in so many ways, so
many scenarios, that each implementation may not use very essential features
of the next one.

6 months ago, I was looking for a platform to build our new service launch,
and evaluated Asterisk, Yate, Kamailio and Freeswitch.

While each can be put to work for us, what made FreeSwitch the final choice
for me was the passion of the core devs (particularly Anthony Minnesale),
and the community that has been built around it.  And, most importantly,
they fix  "any bug" within a day at the worst, mostly coming within hours!
 That is what I can bank on as our core switching platform, open-source or
not.

Regards
HASSAN



On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 06:30, jesse zhao <chat2jesse at gmail.com> wrote:

> I am wondering whether someone did testing of FreeSwitch vs Yate under
> the same hardware system and testing profiles. Which one is more
> scalable?
>
> Any usage case of FS in large service providers or organization in
> terms of 100K subscribers? It is nice to list customers of FS in the
> wiki page.
>
>
> thanks!
>
> -jesse
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100821/435b4287/attachment.html