[Freeswitch-users] freeswitch CPU usage

[Nyamul Hassan]

Aah... the last line means, just the stats on peak performance, modules in
action, CPU / RAM / Disk IO / Network IO.

Regards
HASSAN



On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 23:11, Nyamul Hassan <mnhassan at usa.net> wrote:

> Vlasis, Woody's 2nd email talked about 600 CPS on v1.04.  And, perhaps you
> can share your usage scenario, and how much pressure you could put on
> FreeSwitch before it "crashed"?
>
> No hard feelings, and request to you is to also not take any from Tony's
> comments.  The core team, as I've seen, is devoted to make FS better for
> "production use".  Point out any flaw in "production", and you'll see it
> first hand.
>
> Will like to see your implementation case, btw.
>
> Regards
> HASSAN
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 22:55, David Ponzone <david.ponzone at ipeva.fr>wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> As it seems that this debate is going to last forever without an
>> acceptable conclusion, let's try to refocus on something positive.
>>
>> What is interesting for most of us are the real-world performances.
>> As I said previously, the performance reports page is ready:
>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Real-world_results
>>
>> It would be really nice if the people who have interesting figures could
>> start filling it, as it would probably take them 5 to 10 minutes!
>>
>>  David Ponzone  Direction Technique
>> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr
>> tel:      01 74 03 18 97
>> gsm:   06 66 98 76 34
>>
>> Service Client IPeva
>> tel:      0811 46 26 26
>> www.ipeva.fr  -   www.ipeva-studio.com
>>
>> *Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à
>> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion
>> non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est susceptible
>> d'altération. **IPeva** décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce
>> message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes pas
>> destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et d'avertir
>> l'expéditeur.*
>> *
>> *
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 21/08/2010 à 16:58, Vlasis Hatzistavrou (KTI) a écrit :
>>
>> Hello Jean-Yves,
>>
>> Thanks for the effort to calm me down, but I am calm and fine. :)
>>
>> Just for the record I wasn't the one doing the tests, I was just
>> defending the guy who asked the original question because I've been in
>> his place and felt for him.
>>
>> ;)
>>
>> Rgds,
>> Vlasis.
>>
>> Jean-Yves F. Barbier wrote:
>>
>> Le Sat, 21 Aug 2010 15:41:13 +0300,
>>
>> "Vlasis Hatzistavrou (KTI)" <vhatz at kinetix.gr> a écrit :
>>
>>
>> PLS Vlasis, calm down, I think eveyone is loosing temper riht now.
>>
>>
>> Let's say you took a test option, whether it is a good one  or not could
>> be
>>
>> debated for a long time, but if YOU think it is the right way to go for
>>
>> YOUR needs then go with it!
>>
>> So my advice would be to eventually adjust your method only if you think
>>
>> it would help in your particular case of operation; and stick to it from
>>
>> now in order to always use the same test environment, to have a constant
>>
>> relevance of results and thus constant comparisons possibilities too in
>>
>> time :)
>>
>>
>> (nooo, not in the head!!!:)
>>
>>
>> JY
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100821/88a2dbff/attachment.html