[Freeswitch-users] freeswitch CPU usage

Nyamul Hassan mnhassan at usa.net
Sat Aug 21 10:11:01 PDT 2010


Vlasis, Woody's 2nd email talked about 600 CPS on v1.04.  And, perhaps you
can share your usage scenario, and how much pressure you could put on
FreeSwitch before it "crashed"?

No hard feelings, and request to you is to also not take any from Tony's
comments.  The core team, as I've seen, is devoted to make FS better for
"production use".  Point out any flaw in "production", and you'll see it
first hand.

Will like to see your implementation case, btw.

Regards
HASSAN



On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 22:55, David Ponzone <david.ponzone at ipeva.fr> wrote:

> Guys,
>
> As it seems that this debate is going to last forever without an acceptable
> conclusion, let's try to refocus on something positive.
>
> What is interesting for most of us are the real-world performances.
> As I said previously, the performance reports page is ready:
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Real-world_results
>
> It would be really nice if the people who have interesting figures could
> start filling it, as it would probably take them 5 to 10 minutes!
>
>  David Ponzone  Direction Technique
> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr
> tel:      01 74 03 18 97
> gsm:   06 66 98 76 34
>
> Service Client IPeva
> tel:      0811 46 26 26
> www.ipeva.fr  -   www.ipeva-studio.com
>
> *Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à
> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion
> non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est susceptible
> d'altération. **IPeva** décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce
> message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes pas
> destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et d'avertir
> l'expéditeur.*
> *
> *
>
>
>
> Le 21/08/2010 à 16:58, Vlasis Hatzistavrou (KTI) a écrit :
>
> Hello Jean-Yves,
>
> Thanks for the effort to calm me down, but I am calm and fine. :)
>
> Just for the record I wasn't the one doing the tests, I was just
> defending the guy who asked the original question because I've been in
> his place and felt for him.
>
> ;)
>
> Rgds,
> Vlasis.
>
> Jean-Yves F. Barbier wrote:
>
> Le Sat, 21 Aug 2010 15:41:13 +0300,
>
> "Vlasis Hatzistavrou (KTI)" <vhatz at kinetix.gr> a écrit :
>
>
> PLS Vlasis, calm down, I think eveyone is loosing temper riht now.
>
>
> Let's say you took a test option, whether it is a good one  or not could be
>
> debated for a long time, but if YOU think it is the right way to go for
>
> YOUR needs then go with it!
>
> So my advice would be to eventually adjust your method only if you think
>
> it would help in your particular case of operation; and stick to it from
>
> now in order to always use the same test environment, to have a constant
>
> relevance of results and thus constant comparisons possibilities too in
>
> time :)
>
>
> (nooo, not in the head!!!:)
>
>
> JY
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100821/a0d07263/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list