[Freeswitch-users] Proxy Media and Codec Prefer

Michael Jerris mike at jerris.com
Mon Aug 16 06:44:24 PDT 2010


This is a case of your nat settings simply not being right on the FreeSWITCH side I suspect, study the acl settings and come up with an example of a failure here with full sip trace and debug.

Mike

On Aug 16, 2010, at 4:39 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:

> I use proxy_media as a default because i use only mobile clients.
> 
> In mobile networks there are good chance that FS NAT detection does not
> work.
> 
> That's because several mobile carriers use as "internal ip address" IP
> that are not inside the standard 192.168/16 10/8 and 172.16/16 networks.
> 
> For example H3G in italy use 1/8 networks and in other countries there
> are other fancy approach that are unpredictable.
> In such condition proxy_media is the only solution to have a 100%
> working solution, otherwise in a X% of the case on some mobile operator
> it will just don't work.
> 
> And following all the "particular" internal networks that mobile
> operators follow is not a good way to manage the issue as there are too
> many mobile operators in the world and too many different internal
> network conditions.
> 
> It would be really nice to have some kind of "dynamic" approach, like
> the ones provided by ICE, that are client-independent and server-side
> based to handle such particular issues (IE: without the ability to rely
> on client IP address being inside a particular network).
> 
> Fabio
> 
> On 16/08/10 01.56, Michael Jerris wrote:
>> I don't think there is ever a reason to use proxy_media anymore.  If anyone can provide an example of a good reason to use it I would be interested to hear.
>> 
> 




More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list