[Freeswitch-users] On FS-HA feature: HA + Balancing ?

[Madovsky]

of course you have to use a proxy if
are behind a fw


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Madovsky" <infos at madovsky.org>
To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] On FS-HA feature: HA + Balancing ?


> For now I use NAPTR SRV for load balancing (it's round robin but it avoids
> any proxy)
> for HA you have LVS, Pacemaker, Linix-HA, IBM cluster etc...
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)" <lists at infosecurity.ch>
> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 3:55 AM
> Subject: [Freeswitch-users] On FS-HA feature: HA + Balancing ?
>
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> first of all my compliments for FS-HA features, something really
>> enterprise that make the life of infrastructure architect and system
>> administration much simpler.
>>
>> My simpler question is:
>>
>> Does FS with HA features can do "High availability AND Load Balancing"
>> without using third party SIP Proxy?
>>
>> If so the FS would simplify a lot most of the IP architecture as it may
>> be possible to just put more FS boxes into a HA+Balancing "server farm"
>> when you need more power.
>>
>> Is that possible?
>>
>> Fabio
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org