[Freeswitch-users] Preventing disconnect on event_sockte close

[Weaver, Eric]

Looking a FS to use as Media mixer for conferencing platform. Not really doing call to call bridging. We really don't have extensions.... Conferences are created o the fly as needed.  Already have the conf and call control app done and in production using a different audio mixer, I would like to put FS  in place of it.

From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael Collins
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 3:40 PM
To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Preventing disconnect on event_sockte close


On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Weaver, Eric <eweaver at meetingone.com<mailto:eweaver at meetingone.com>> wrote:

Using api uuid_park 81b65478-70b9-11de-bf26-b962186102f7 before terminating the NC session works, the call is not disconnected.



Once that is done, I do not receive DTMF and cannot play prompts to the caller, they seem to be in limbo. I can uuid_kill the call but I need to get dtmf and play prompts to them.  Perhaps Park is not where I need to put these calls ?


To get a call out of park you need to bridge to it or transfer it to another extension. If you have an extension you can just uuid_transfer the parked call's uuid. If you have an existing call's uuid you can use uuid_bridge to bridge the two together.

Could you remind me of the application you're building? Just curious what the big picture is.
-MC

From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org> [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org>] On Behalf Of Michael Collins
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 11:12 AM
To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Preventing disconnect on event_sockte close





On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Weaver, Eric <eweaver at meetingone.com<mailto:eweaver at meetingone.com>> wrote:

Tried it using    FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.4pre9 (14036M)  and the following steps



Start netcat



netcat -v -l -p 14000



place call, socket is connected via dial plan,   enter the following.



connect\n\n



sendmsg

call-command: execute

execute-app-name: answer\n\n





sendmsg

call-command: execute

execute-app-name: playback

execute-app-arg: /home/eweaver/holdmusic.wav





<when wave file is done playing>



sendmsg

call-command: execute

execute-app-name: park

Try this:
api uuid_park <uuid>

You'll need to capture the uuid at some point and store it. For testing I just manually copied and pasted it to/from the console screen.
-MC



Console window displays this message:



2009-07-14 10:42:29.245833 [ERR] switch_ivr.c:654 Cannot park channels that are under control already.



at this point, ^C in the netcat window. Call is disconnected.





Need to be able to park these calls so they can then be handled from an inbound event socket connection.



eric













From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org> [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org>] On Behalf Of Michael Collins
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 7:08 PM
To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Preventing disconnect on event_sockte close



I don't know if this will work for you but I just tested this scenario with uuid_park. After parking the call I disconnected the socket and the call continued. I did the same thing with uuid_transfer. After the transfer I disconnected the socket and the call continued.

How are you handling the call and how is the socket getting disconnected?

-MC

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Weaver, Eric <eweaver at meetingone.com<mailto:eweaver at meetingone.com>> wrote:

Using mod_event_socket in outbound mode, is there any  to prevent a call from being disconnected when the outbound socket is closed ? I would like to handle the initial inbound call using outbound but after the disposition of the call is determined, close the socket and have that call managed using an inbound socket instead.



Eric Weaver

_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org



_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org



_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20090714/f5f4b6e5/attachment-0002.html