[Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch vs. Asterisk speed on ARM

[Rogelio Perez]

Thanks Andrew and Anthony,

I created a ramdisk for the db and log directories using tmpfs and now  
I see better performance times:

startup:		15.6 sec.
call extension: 	0 sec.
shutdown:	7.5 sec
reload config:	0 sec.

I have noticed that during the startup there is a 12 sec. pause while  
checking for UPnP:

2009-08-24 04:39:29.910459 [ERR] switch_nat.c:183 Error checking for  
PMP [general error]
2009-08-24 04:39:29.910694 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:397 Checking for UPnP
2009-08-24 04:39:41.906029 [INFO] switch_nat.c:411 No PMP or UPnP NAT  
detected!

Is there any way to lower this time? Maybe disabling the check?

Thanks,
Rogelio

On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:20 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote:

> probably disk i/o.
>
> Is it some kind of flash drive?
>
> make a ramdisk and simlink in /usr/local/freeswitch/db and /usr/ 
> local/freeswitch/log to it
> the default configuration uses a lot of high level features that use  
> the sqlite db on the disk.
>
> We also offer commercial support where we could dig deeper into the  
> problem if you can't figure it out
> consulting at freeswitch.org
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Rogelio Perez <rogelio.perez at gmail.com 
> > wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm working on a PBX project for the Sheevaplug ARM based computer,  
> with the following specs: CPU 1.2 GHz, 512MB DDR2, no FPU.
> So far I've found a big difference between Freeswitch and Asterisk  
> performance times.
> This is a comparison of the time it takes them to perform different  
> actions:
>
> startup Freeswitch:			3 min.
> startup Asterisk:			2 sec.
>
> call extension Freeswitch:	6 sec.
> call extension Asterisk:		0 sec.
>
> shutdown Freeswitch:		6.5 sec
> shutdown Asterisk:			0 sec.
>
> reload config Freeswitch: 	1 sec.
> reload config Asterisk:		1 sec.
>
> Both were built from sources natively (no cross-compiling), and they  
> use the default startup configurations.
> I have managed to lower the Freeswitch times by disabling most of  
> the modules and recompiling, but it is still far away from Asterisk  
> (i.e. FS startup time 2.5 min).
>
> 1. Is there any way to further improve Freeswitch performance for  
> the ARM architecture?
> 2. Can this be related to the lack of a FPU (the Sheevalug emulates  
> the floating point operations).
> 3. On the startup I see this error repeated many times: [ERR]  
> switch_core_sqldb.c:95 SQL ERR [database is locked]. Can this be  
> related?
>
> Thanks,
> Rogelio Perez
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Anthony Minessale II
>
> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire
>
> AIM: anthm
> MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com
> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com
> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
>
> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
> sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org
> iax:guest at conference.freeswitch.org/888
> googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org
> pstn:213-799-1400
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20090824/c826add3/attachment-0002.html