[Freeswitch-users] VoiceXML

[Matt Porter]

As opposed to what?!

I don't think anyone will claim that voicexml is super elegant... Only  
that it sucks the least



On Apr 23, 2009, at 7:08 PM, Steve Underwood <steveu at coppice.org> wrote:

> mszlazak wrote:
>> If you don't like vxml then here is a post on voicePHP
>>
>> http://www.speechtechblog.com/2009/04/22/voicexml-to-go-down-in-the-third-says-voicephp
>>
>> It's from a vendor but there might be some good ideas to get from  
>> what they
>> are doing.
>>
>> FreeSWITCH needs demand to get vxml and it's not there yet. For  
>> now, it
>> looks like the FS community is waiting for demand instead of trying  
>> to
>> create it.
>>
> Its interesting how the VoiceXML pushers have been able to create the
> air in some circles that VoiceXML is the norm for IVR creation. Its
> actually pretty hard to find people who have ever used it.
>
> I think voiceXML has one big thing going for it - nothing else for IVR
> building has been standardised. Apart from that its really clunky.  
> Only
> the most trivial examples look even moderately clean and readable.
>
> Steve
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org