[Freeswitch-users] FS failover redundancy & load balancing

[Pablo Hernan Saro]

Not opensips but the module is in alpha. In the modules doc page says
"alpha/new".

Pablo



On 4/3/09, Even André Fiskvik <grevenx at me.com> wrote:
> Where do you guys read that it's in alpha?
> On the opensips.org they proclaim OpenSips 1.5 released,
> with that module being one of the new features. I don't see any
> mention of it being alpha/beta functionality?
>
> Best regards,
> Even André
>
> On 4. april. 2009, at 00.30, Pablo Hernan Saro wrote:
>
>> Hi Kristian, you're right. Definitively that will be best solution
>> as soon as it's released as stable (it's alpha now).
>> http://www.opensips.org/index.php?n=Resources.DocsTutLoadbalancing
>>
>> Pablo
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Kristian Kielhofner
>> <kristian.kielhofner at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>> You could try (although it's somewhat bleeding edge) to use OpenSIPS
>> 1.5 with load_balancer (not heavily tested, btw) in front of some
>> FreeSWITCH machines:
>>
>> http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/devel/load_balancer.html
>>
>> 2009/4/2 Ashley van Gerven <ashley.ohq at gmail.com>:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I can't find much info on setting up a redundant or heavy load
>> FreeSwitch
>> > implementation. Are there any
>> > links apart from: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Enterprise_deployment
>>  ?
>> >
>> > I imagine the entry level solution is to have two FS boxes
>> configured
>> > identitcally, with
>> > redundant SBC software (recommendations?) in front, passing the
>> calls to the
>> > primary FS box,
>> > or the backup FS box if the primary is not responding. Is that the
>> easiest
>> > solution?
>> >
>> > What about a situation of having a level of concurrent calls
>> beyond what one
>> > FS box can handle? I realise
>> > that would be a very large number of concurrent calls, but we
>> would need a
>> > good plan on how to scale the
>> > systems.
>> >
>> > Are there recommendations for load balancing solutions? Either
>> soft or
>> > hardware?
>> >
>> > My guess would be having 3 + 1 spare FS servers would work, where
>> calls are
>> > distributed accross 3 FS boxes
>> > by a load balancer with one spare in event of failure.
>> >
>> > Also how would a FS box at max capacity behave? Does FS monitor
>> available
>> > resources and reject the
>> > excess calls that it can't handle? Or would the load balancer have
>> to be
>> > configured with the maximum number
>> > of calls per box?
>> >
>> > Would love to hear some experiences of deploying FS with failover
>> & high
>> > load.
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Ash
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Freeswitch-users mailing list
>> > Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> > http://www.freeswitch.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kristian Kielhofner
>> http://blog.krisk.org
>> http://www.submityoursip.com
>> http://www.astlinux.org
>> http://www.star2star.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freeswitch-users mailing list
>> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freeswitch-users mailing list
>> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>

-- 
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com