[Freeswitch-users] mod_portaudio send 3rtppacket/60msinsteadof1packet/20ms
Csaba Zelei
csaba.zelei at gmail.com
Tue May 13 23:13:18 PDT 2008
Hi,
I tested the latest trunk afternoon (r8378).
The timing is not perfect, 16,16,31ms almost constant but we have done a
lot of tests and the audio was good if not perfect.
I am sure its going to be ok when we start to use it out of the test
environment.
Thanks for your time and help Anthony!
Csaba
ps: If I find a way to do better timing on windows i will surely share
it with you
Anthony Minessale wrote:
> I think that is where i have to draw the line and say get some better
> hardware........
> I did my best but if the box sucks that badly at timing i am not sure
> what else to do because it's working flawlessly on mine which proves
> it depends on the box and i dont 'even like portaudio
>
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:34 AM, Sluschny, Thomas
> <Thomas.Sluschny at siemens.com <mailto:Thomas.Sluschny at siemens.com>> wrote:
>
> ok,
> now it looks better, i. e. the switch_core_timer_check() times the
> ReadAudioStream function,
> but not perfect, now i see packets with differences of 15, 30, 45,
> 0 ms,
> e. g. 15, 15, 30, 15, 15, 15, 31, 16, 15, 31, 15, 16, 16, 29 ms
> and so on
>
> Looks like we already stuck with time resolution, but the
> switch_yield(1000) in ReadAudioStream() seems to work properly,
> strange ...
> I don't have the time to go deeper into and i next read my emails
> on tuesday :(
>
> I don't want to hijack this thread from Csaba, should we make a
> jira entry, Csaba? (for Anthonys clients sake :) )
>
> Thomas
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20080514/d571e259/attachment-0002.html
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list