[Freeswitch-users] Installation report, a python crash and a bottleneck

[Matt Porter]

you could do a metric for CPS, with an (almost) empty script.
which would give you only the "startup" cost of a module.
And thats going to be very different for the modules.

But, i know where you are coming from..
we maintain a fork of OpenVXI we get the same kind of loaded questions..
Q:  "how many ports can we do per box?"
A:  "depends on what your scripts do"

Love those questions ;)


On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org> wrote:
> You really can't do a metric like that.  Its all going to depend on
> what you're doing in your scripts how fast you can go.  If you really
> want speed you need to be using outbound event socket which is like
> Fast AGI but 10 times more powerful.
>
>
> On Jun 13, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
>
>> What is really needed is an associated "cost' with the modules.
>> Granted, that is a hard thing to get a defined metric for.
>>
>> Blanket statements like "Freeswitch does millions of calls a day, and
>> 500 CPS, or whatever".. arent very useful to the rest of us without
>> knowing the configuration they are using.
>> Even if you rewrite your IVR in javascript, you still might have
>> problems.  Spidermonkey itself has some global contention in it too
>> and is not going to scale linearly.  But at what point is that even
>> noticed?
>>
>> Given some predefined reference platform..it would be nice to look at
>> a chart of modules
>>
>> mod_lua = 500 CPS
>> mod_spidermonkey = 300 CPS
>> mod_python = 50 CPS
>>
>
> Brian West
> sip:brian at freeswitch.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>