[Freeswitch-users] Routing, redundancy , balance between multiple vendors

chav paskov chav at vocalscape.com
Mon Sep 24 17:10:55 PDT 2007


Thank you for your prompt response.

Is there any setting that controls the number of max allowed connections  in
sofia/IAX  or in the context xml.

I'm not 100% positive but DNS SRV  gives you  redundancy /which is good /
but doesn't allow you to control the actual load sent to Vendor 1 or Vendor
2.

Pls correct me if I'm wrong.

Regards

 

 

Chav Paskov

CTO Vocalscape Networks Inc.

Office:+1 (604) 696-6313 ext 102

Fax: +1 (604) 696-6315

Cell:+1 (604) 761-6388

 <mailto:chav at vocalscape.com> chav at vocalscape.com

  _____  

From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Jason
Garland
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 4:34 PM
To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Routing, redundancy ,balance between
multiple vendors

 

I would use SIP and a SIP proxy or SIP with DNS SRV records.

On 9/24/07, chav paskov <chav at vocalscape.com> wrote: 



 

Hi Everybody,

The pic above  describes /I hope/ what I'm willing to accomplish using
Freeswitch.

I think the pic is self explanatory and I have few questions based on it.

1. Is there any mechanism /application/ that would allow me to do round
robin between Vendor 1 and Vendor 2. 

 

Currently my settings are:

 

  <extension name="FreeSWITCH routing to IAX VENDORS">

    <condition field="destination_number" expression="^8888$">

      <action application="set" data="hangup_after_bridge=true"/>

      <action application="set" data="continue_of_fail=true"/>

      <action application="set" data="call_timeout=5"/>

      <action application="set" data="no_media=true"/>

      <action application="bridge"
data="iax/marko:moofoo at XXX.XXX.XXX.242/1234567890"/>

      <action application="bridge"
data="iax/marko:moofoo at XXX.XXX.XXX.243/1234567890"/>

    </condition>

  </extension>

 

Which gives me only Fail over functionality. 

2. Can I apply the scenario described above using priority + number of
active connections.

Example:

 

I'd like to be able to send all calls to Vendor 1  until the number of
active connections reaches 250. All calls generated later on to be sent to
Vendor 2.

 

I'd really appreciate if  somebody replies to this e-mail  with some good
examples, or at least a hint.

 

Best regards

 

 

 

 

Chav Paskov 

CTO Vocalscape Networks Inc. 

Office:+1 (604) 696-6313 ext 102 

Fax: +1 (604) 696-6315 

Cell:+1 (604) 761-6388 

 <mailto:chav at vocalscape.com> chav at vocalscape.com

 


_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org 
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org




 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20070924/787f867d/attachment-0002.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 8838 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20070924/787f867d/attachment-0002.gif 


More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list