[Freeswitch-dev] OPTIONS

Suneel Papineni Suneel.Papineni at mettoni.com
Thu Nov 19 05:23:48 PST 2009

Hi Mic,


In my set-up there is a gateway that is sending calls to FS. GW is
configured with primary as FS1 and secondary as FS2. Here gateway sends
OPTIONS message to both FS1 And FS2. If FS1 is responding then it is
treated as alive and calls will be sent to FS1 only. If FS1 is not
responding for 2 -3 OPTION messages, gateway treats it as dead and calls
are sent to FS2.


when there is any modification or upgrade needed to FS1, then I want
stop responding to OPTIONS (so GW can send new calls to FS2) and wait
till all existing calls at FS1 are cleared. Then I can perform upgrade
on FS1.


So is there anyway to instruct FS (through event sockets), not to
respond to OPTIONS message received from the GW.


Thanks & Regards




From: freeswitch-dev-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-dev-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of
Michael Jerris
Sent: 18 November 2009 17:53
To: freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] OPTIONS


Why would you not want to respond to those?



On Nov 18, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Suneel Papineni wrote:



Is there anyway that I can instruct FS, not to send response to OPTIONS
message that it has received from an IP or any IP.


Thanks & Regards



Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.  http://www.mettoni.com

Mettoni Ltd
Registered in England and Wales: 4485956
9400 Garsington Road, Oxford Business Park, Oxford, OX4 2HN

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-dev/attachments/20091119/7d3c0c68/attachment.html 

More information about the FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list