[Freeswitch-dev] CCXML/VXML module
jaugenstine at gmail.com
Fri Mar 6 12:33:56 PST 2009
I think your points are well taken and I certainly do not want to start down
a road that is a dead end. What makes me think I "need" VXML is that is
what my client is requesting. That is usually a pretty good determination
in my book. That being said I am not beyond pushing another solution if I
think it will be to their benefit. I am not looking for input on the
project design. I am trying to determine if there would be benefit to
Freeswitch of having a built in VXML interpreter. That is my only real
question. If not, I will push much harder on the client to reconsider their
request and consider other alternatives.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Matt Porter <mporter at voice3g.com> wrote:
> what makes you think you "need" voicexml,
> I wouldnt suggest flooding the market with yet another half done voicexml
> if you try to implement one from scratch, you will quickly realize that
> finishing the last 10% is more than 90% of the work. Then its in the state
> as all the other opensource voicexml interpreters out there.
> what you end up with just kinda smells like voicexml, and isnt terribly
> portable.. then you might be asking yourself why didnt i just use some other
> scripting language in FS and save myself all that time.
> VoiceXML from my experience is an all or nothing thing. People either
> want it, or they dont.
> They dont want a half-baked interperter that cant pass the IR compliance
> I dont know how we can offer if it makes sense in the "design of the
> project you are working on".. you havent offered much detail there.
> Freeswitch-dev mailing list
> Freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Freeswitch-dev