[Freeswitch-dev] Ecasound support in FreeSWITCH?
steveu at coppice.org
Fri Feb 13 03:56:29 PST 2009
What you are doing now looks very elementary, and there is no real
reason to use ecasound. I don't know what you intend to do as you flesh
out this quality assessment, but its not clear to me where ecasound
would ever be a big benefit in such a tool.
Not using ecasound certainly simplifies its licencing issues. :-)
Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
> That's what I do now and it's somewhat clunky.
> There is one advantage: you can continually tweak ecasound params to
> look for other audio issues and reprocess the files. Other than that
> it seems like a module is the way to go.
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:35 AM, William Suffill
> <william.suffill at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Well placing calls and analyzing the results after the fact would avoid any
>> licensing issues. As long as you have recordings that could be processed the
>> concept should still work.
>> - W
>> PS: Yes haven't had any coffee yet so might me out of my mind =)
>> Freeswitch-dev mailing list
>> Freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
More information about the Freeswitch-dev