[Freeswitch-dev] SLA/BLA

M Matijas mladen at podiumvision.co.uk
Wed Apr 2 06:08:42 EDT 2008

Give me your direct email so we can discuss off list please


From: freeswitch-dev-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-dev-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Brian West
Sent: 02 April 2008 11:39
To: freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] SLA/BLA


You crack me up.... Sorry their stack is not less buggy.  The fact they
don't process multiple m= lines is a violation of the sip spec.  


btw I found one bug in the phone in under 4 min of plugging it in.  So far
Snom has had the least amount of bugs and every one of them I have found
were related to SRTP and TLS.  Not something very well tested in the wild.




On Apr 2, 2008, at 4:26 AM, M Matijas wrote:

Their audio quality is superior & their SIP stack has been less buggy.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-dev/attachments/20080402/f38e707b/attachment.html 

More information about the Freeswitch-dev mailing list