[Freeswitch-dev] Production ready?

[Brian West]

http://www.beanshell.org/

Is that what you mean?

/b

On Sep 6, 2006, at 3:19 PM, Amon Ghupta wrote:

> PHP is a welcome addition, however the end-goal should be that  
> using BSF
> "bean shell language" one can use ANY SCRIPTING language one is  
> good at.
> Ruby or JavaScript
> The JavaScript language itself is standardized by Standard ECMA-262
> /ECMAScript: A general purpose, cross-platform programming language/.
> Rhino 1.5 implements JavaScript 1.5, which conforms to Edition 3 of  
> the
> Standard. The Standard may be downloaded
> <http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/ 
> Ecma-262.htm>
> or obtained by mail from ECMA, 114 Rue du Rhône, CH1204 Geneva,
> Switzerland.
>
> Rhino 1.6 also implements ECMA-357 /ECMAScript for XML (E4X)/. See the
> specification
> <http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/ 
> Ecma-357.htm>
> for more information on the standard, and Rhino version 1.6R1
> <http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/rhino16R1.html#E4X> for details on the
> implementation in Rhino.
>
> In addition, Rhino has implemented JavaAdapters, which allows  
> JavaScript
> to implement any Java interface or extend any Java class with a
> JavaScript object. See the enum.js example for more information.
>
> -E
>
>
>
> Yossi Neiman wrote:
>
>> Good news then, I believe somebody is currently working on a PHP
>> interpreter embedded in the switch.
>>
>>
>> Yossi Neiman
>> Cartis Solutions, Inc. - http://www.cartissolutions.com
>>
>>
>> julian howard wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I'd like to work in PHP asap. I'd like nothing more
>>> than to see what all freeswitch can do.
>>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>> --- Yossi Neiman <iaxteling at cartissolutions.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> There is no real ETA, as we are are currently
>>>> driving our milestones
>>>> according to features implemented and not according
>>>> to strict dates.  We
>>>> still have a number of features to design and
>>>> implement, least of all
>>>> the concept of users.  We feel it is much more
>>>> important that we design
>>>> things properly so that we avoid spaghetti code and
>>>> a series of
>>>> bandaids/plasters/whatever you call them trying to
>>>> heal a wound that
>>>> requires stitches.
>>>>
>>>> If you would like to help out and test what we
>>>> already have in the
>>>> system, please do so by all means.  The more bugs we
>>>> can find and kill
>>>> early on, the less we will be banging our heads over
>>>> later on.
>>>>
>>>> If your system does not require full authentication,
>>>> especially for
>>>> inbound calls, then it is possible that you might be
>>>> able to use
>>>> freeswitch in a production environment.  If you want
>>>> more information,
>>>> please let us  know in more specific terms what it
>>>> is that you would
>>>> like to do with it, and we can answer that question
>>>> more effectively.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yossi Neiman
>>>> Cartis Solutions, Inc. -
>>>> http://www.cartissolutions.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> julian howard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> What's the ETA for a production ready version of
>>>>> freeswitch? Why isn't it considered production
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ready
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> now?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thnxx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-dev mailing list
> Freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
> http://www.freeswitch.org