[Freeswitch-dev] Production ready?

[Amon Ghupta]

PHP is a welcome addition, however the end-goal should be that using BSF
"bean shell language" one can use ANY SCRIPTING language one is good at.
Ruby or JavaScript
The JavaScript language itself is standardized by Standard ECMA-262
/ECMAScript: A general purpose, cross-platform programming language/.
Rhino 1.5 implements JavaScript 1.5, which conforms to Edition 3 of the
Standard. The Standard may be downloaded
<http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm>
or obtained by mail from ECMA, 114 Rue du Rhône, CH1204 Geneva,
Switzerland.

Rhino 1.6 also implements ECMA-357 /ECMAScript for XML (E4X)/. See the
specification
<http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-357.htm>
for more information on the standard, and Rhino version 1.6R1
<http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/rhino16R1.html#E4X> for details on the
implementation in Rhino.

In addition, Rhino has implemented JavaAdapters, which allows JavaScript
to implement any Java interface or extend any Java class with a
JavaScript object. See the enum.js example for more information.

-E



Yossi Neiman wrote:

>Good news then, I believe somebody is currently working on a PHP 
>interpreter embedded in the switch.
>
>
>Yossi Neiman
>Cartis Solutions, Inc. - http://www.cartissolutions.com
>
>
>julian howard wrote:
>  
>
>>I'd like to work in PHP asap. I'd like nothing more
>>than to see what all freeswitch can do.
>>
>>cheers
>>
>>--- Yossi Neiman <iaxteling at cartissolutions.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>  
>>    
>>
>>>There is no real ETA, as we are are currently
>>>driving our milestones 
>>>according to features implemented and not according
>>>to strict dates.  We 
>>>still have a number of features to design and
>>>implement, least of all 
>>>the concept of users.  We feel it is much more
>>>important that we design 
>>>things properly so that we avoid spaghetti code and
>>>a series of 
>>>bandaids/plasters/whatever you call them trying to
>>>heal a wound that 
>>>requires stitches.
>>>
>>>If you would like to help out and test what we
>>>already have in the 
>>>system, please do so by all means.  The more bugs we
>>>can find and kill 
>>>early on, the less we will be banging our heads over
>>>later on.
>>>
>>>If your system does not require full authentication,
>>>especially for 
>>>inbound calls, then it is possible that you might be
>>>able to use 
>>>freeswitch in a production environment.  If you want
>>>more information, 
>>>please let us  know in more specific terms what it
>>>is that you would 
>>>like to do with it, and we can answer that question
>>>more effectively.
>>>
>>>
>>>Yossi Neiman
>>>Cartis Solutions, Inc. -
>>>http://www.cartissolutions.com
>>>
>>>
>>>julian howard wrote:
>>>    
>>>      
>>>
>>>>What's the ETA for a production ready version of
>>>>freeswitch? Why isn't it considered production
>>>>      
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>ready
>>>    
>>>      
>>>
>>>>now?
>>>>
>>>>Thnxx
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>
>  
>