[Freeswitch-users] why FS respons BYE to Transferor afer REFER

Yuriy Nasida ynasida at gmail.com
Thu Jun 4 06:15:37 UTC 2020

Well, I had to use park/execute_on_sip_reinvite/intercept and implement
this according RFC on my own.

On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 at 21:08, Yuriy Nasida <ynasida at gmail.com> wrote:

> RFC 5589 says:
> "Note that a
>    successful REFER transaction does not terminate the session between
>    the Transferor and the Transferee"
> REFER is successful. Why FS sends BYE to Transferor
> Any advice are welcome.
> On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 at 19:24, Yuriy Nasida <ynasida at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Guys, do you know why FS respons with 202/NOTIFY/BYE to REFER ?
>> In my opinioin FS should not sends BYE to Transferor at once.
>> That is very weird because (after refer) FS sends INVITE to Transfer
>> Target (like it should be) and this part of call is fine.
>> Why FS sends BYE to Transferor... I checked rcf5589 / rfc3892 and
>> Transferee (FS) never does so. In fs_cli FS just said (after new leg bridge
>> is done) that last dialplan instruction is done, hung up.
>> Please advice.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20200604/2140b704/attachment.html>

More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list