[Freeswitch-users] WebRTC and Carrier NAT ( CgNAT)

[Sergey Safarov]

Many carrier use this NAT schema.
At home i have double NAT.
1) my home WiFi router
2) carrier cone NAT

All works as expected. Tested WebRTC (sipML5) and Verto.



пт, 16 июн. 2017 г. в 12:01, Tihomir Culjaga <tculjaga at gmail.com>:

> hello,
>
> does anyone have experience with WebRTC via carrier NAT ?
>
> client_LAN(192.168.x.y) <NAT> carrer_prvate_WAN(10.x.x.x) <NAT>
> carrier_public_WAN(public_ip) <> internet
>
>
> in this scenario, WebRTC calls using STUN only will not work. What about
> TURN ?
>
> did anyone try that ?
>
> Regards,
> Tihomir.
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20170616/a0c0ff30/attachment.html>