[Freeswitch-users] freeswitch with tickless linux kernel

[Stanislav Sinyagin]

FreeSWITCH relies heavily on timers, so every media playback or
conference will be (probably severely) distracted if your kernel ticks
are not frequent enough.

In regards to virtualization, the virtualization itself is not too
bad, but the problem is, that with most of hosting offers you get a
best-effort service, sharing the CPU power with other unknown parties.
So, you can't really say how many simultaneous calls your host can
handle.

By the way, scaleway.com has just published a new offering for physical hosting.



On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:55 PM, François <fdelawarde at wirelessmundi.com> wrote:
> Is it still recommended to use custom 1000HZ kernels for FS servers or
> can we go tickless now?
>
> Any difference if FS is installed in baremetal vs virtualized?
>
> Thanks,
> François.
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org