[Freeswitch-users] deflect vs redirect vs bridge
steveayre at gmail.com
Tue Jan 12 23:40:24 MSK 2016
But bear in mind that the client might not follow the 302. FreeSWITCH for
example either terminates the call on 302 or returns to the dialplan so you
can validate the new destination, so that you don't (as an example) have
someone redirecting you to a premium rate number without the caller's
On 11 January 2016 at 13:59, Michael Jerris <mike at jerris.com> wrote:
> redirect using full sip uri should do a 302
> On Monday, January 11, 2016, ik <idokan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have an incoming call that on some occurrences, instead of answering
>> it, I need to "move" the call to a different Freeswitch server.
>> I have tried to use deflect, and redirect, however the call with deflect
>> just hangup immediately, and with redirect, it arrive to timeout and then
>> I'ved noticed at the wiki page (confluence) that the call must be
>> answered with deflect.
>> Only when I use bridge, the other Freeswitch see's the SIP request and
>> handle the call properly, but as a statful request.
>> How can I make the original Freeswitch out of the routing or at least
>> make it stateless redirect (302) instead of stateful one?
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
Join us at ClueCon 2016 Aug 8-12, 2016
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users