[Freeswitch-users] Verto vs SIP

[Bob Hartwig]

But stating that one client is more stable and better sounding than another
doesn't really answer the original question.  Why not use SIP over
WebSockets for signaling, when SIP is a proven, standard, flexible protocol?

Bob





On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Oivvio Polite <mylists at polite.se> wrote:

> On ons, apr 20, 2016 at 04:11:06 +0300, Igor Olhovskiy wrote:
> > >From my experience, verto is much more stable and more resource and
> > browser(js) friendly, than sipjs and other SIP implementations of SIP.
> > With various SIP libraries I’ve got strange issues, like sound delay
> (time
> > to time), not working audio in most fresh browsers, other some strange
> > issues. But verto was installed over a year ago and still working without
> > any troubles (with FS 1.5, I believe)
> > So, my voice is for verto.
> >
>
> This is exactly the kind of information I need (The kind that is never
> in the docs). Thanks for sharing!
>
> regards Oivvio
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20160420/eb3939b9/attachment.html