[Freeswitch-users] Cisco SPA + BLF behavior

Gabriel Kuri gkuri at ieee.org
Wed Jan 14 09:36:29 MSK 2015

The latest "release", 1.4.15. I don't think it's Freeswitch, as I do see
the the appropriate SIP NOTIFY messages coming from Freeswitch to tell the
phone the line has been taken off hook (seized), but the phone just doesn't
change the light to red, until an actual call is in progress. However when
the line on the SPA is setup as a shared line appearance, it works fine
when a remote phone takes the line off hook, it's seems to be the BLF mode
that doesn't work correctly.

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Robert Stevens <rstevens at robcoit.com>

>  Hello Gabriel,
>  What revision of Freeswitch are you running currently?
>  Best regards,
>  Robert Stevens
> *rstevens at robcoit.com <rstevens at robcoit.com>*
>   ------------------------------
> *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org <
> freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org> on behalf of Gabriel Kuri <
> gkuri at ieee.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 13, 2015 2:13 AM
> *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help
> *Subject:* [Freeswitch-users] Cisco SPA + BLF behavior
>  I noticed that on a Cisco SPA500 series phone, when configured to do
> BLF+SD+CP for an extension, the LED for that line on the SPA does not turn
> red when the line goes off-hook on another phone. It turns RED when the
> call is actually in progress (ie after the number has been dialed and it's
> ringing). This behavior is different than when the same line is configured
> as a shared line appearance on the SPA, the LED turns red immedialtely when
> the line goes off hook on another phone. It appears FreeSWITCH is sending
> the same SIP NOTIFY event in both cases with line showing seized
> (appearance-index=1;appearance-state=seized), so I'm think this might be a
> bug in the phone's firmware, which is running the latest version, 7.5.6a. I
> did try a couple older version and had the same results. Am I missing
> something or is this the behavior of this phone? Should I bother to open a
> TAC case with Cisco, the behavior seems buggy to me?
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20150113/78a55b9f/attachment-0001.html 

Join us at ClueCon 2016 Aug 8-12, 2016
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list