[Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH with rabbit mq
ssinyagin at gmail.com
Sun Sep 21 11:15:38 MSD 2014
Wiki suggests CHANNEL_HANGUP_COMPLETE
On Sep 21, 2014 4:01 AM, "Vladimir Ralev" <vladimir.ralev at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there an ESL event for reporting state? In any case CHANNEL_DESTROY
> seems good enough in kazoo and it's better to filter out redundant events.
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Michael Jerris <mike at jerris.com> wrote:
>> Based on channel_destroy? cdrs should be done in the reporting state
>> before destroy.
>> On Sep 20, 2014, at 1:50 AM, Vladimir Ralev <vladimir.ralev at gmail.com>
>> Hi, It shouldn't affect performance at all. CDR events are usually 2-3
>> per call max. Kazoo record CDRs based on CHANNEL_DESTROY and it travels
>> FreeSwitch->mod_kazoo(mod_erlang)->epmd->ecallmgr->RabbitMQ/AMQP (fanout at
>> that iirc) -> multiple consumers (CDR app is one of them). Rabbit is by far
>> the most robust link in this scenario in my experience.
>> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Andre Demattia <andretodd at verizon.net>
>>> Hi has anyone used FreeSWITCH with your cdrs going to rabbitmq?
>>> Will the rabbit mq interfere with FreeSWITCH? Like take up TCP ports? Or
>>> impact performance?
>> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>> consulting at freeswitch.org
>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
Join us at ClueCon 2016 Aug 8-12, 2016
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users