[Freeswitch-users] NOTIFY's Cseq too high?
Anthony Minessale
anthony.minessale at gmail.com
Mon Sep 8 23:59:52 MSD 2014
Leave it to RFC's to demand you use a 32 bit unsigned number and then
require it to be less than 2^31 (signed value) and waste a few billion
values.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Michael Jerris <mike at jerris.com> wrote:
> actually that is the 31 bit max, not the 32 bit... but thats a different
> story. There is now a patch in tree that fixes this issue.
>
> On Sep 8, 2014, at 3:21 PM, Spencer Thomason <spencer at 5ninesolutions.com>
> wrote:
>
> Yes, you are correct, all devices freaked out until they we rebooted. The
> issue appears to be that the Cseq exceeded 32bit max. Before this change I
> was seeing Cseq values as 2147483647 which is 32bit max. As soon as the
> dust clears I’ll file a jira. I don’t really know what a good upgrade path
> might be but it seems the calculation method has to change.
>
> I guess we do have to limit the value to 32bits:
> 8.1.1.5 CSeq
>
> The CSeq header field serves as a way to identify and order
> transactions. It consists of a sequence number and a method. The
> method MUST match that of the request. For non-REGISTER requests
> outside of a dialog, the sequence number value is arbitrary. The
> sequence number value MUST be expressible as a 32-bit unsigned
> integer and MUST be less than 2**31. As long as it follows the above
> guidelines, a client may use any mechanism it would like to select
> CSeq header field values.
>
> Thanks,
> Spencer
>
>
>
> On Sep 8, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Michael Jerris <mike at jerris.com> wrote:
>
> changing this on a busy switch will almost for sure make presence not work
> correctly.
>
> On Sep 8, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Spencer Thomason <spencer at 5ninesolutions.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
> I know this is an insanely dirty hack but can I change the following line
> in sofia_presence.c to a smaller multiple?
> 2115 callsequence = (now - mod_sofia_globals.presence_epoch) * 100;
> i.e.:
> callsequence = (now - mod_sofia_globals.presence_epoch) * 10;
>
> Thanks in advance!
> Spencer
>
>
>
> On Sep 8, 2014, at 8:29 AM, Yehavi Bourvine <yehavi.bourvine at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I tried locating how the Caeq is generated. Didn't manage yet to get all
> the details, but the initial value is dependant on the current time. Seems
> like we have Bug-2k on Polycom :-(
>
> __Yehavi:
>
>
> 2014-09-08 17:41 GMT+03:00 Spencer Thomason <spencer at 5ninesolutions.com>:
>
>> I just ran into the same issue across several different sites. Thanks
>> Polycom for the exciting Monday morning. I’ll try to collect some traces
>> once the fires die down.
>>
>> BR,
>> Spencer
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 8, 2014, at 6:48 AM, Michael Jerris <mike at jerris.com> wrote:
>>
>> > cseq for notify and invite have nothing at all to do with each other.
>> A sip trace would probably help what is going on make more sense.
>> >
>> > On Sep 7, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Yehavi Bourvine <yehavi.bourvine at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> My Polycom phones stopped showing presence today. They reply with
>> "loop detected" after they receive the NOTIFY message. In their Syslog they
>> complain that Cseq is outside boundaries...
>> >> The Cseq for INVITE is much smaller.
>> >>
>> >> How can I reset the Cseq to lower values?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks! __Yehavi:
>> >
>> >
>>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
>
>
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
>
>
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
>
>
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
--
Anthony Minessale II ♬ @anthmfs ♬ @FreeSWITCH ♬
☞ http://freeswitch.org/ ☞ http://cluecon.com/ ☞
http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH
☞ irc.freenode.net #freeswitch ☞ *http://freeswitch.org/g+
<http://freeswitch.org/g+>*
ClueCon Weekly Development Call
☎ sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org ☎ +19193869900
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20140908/bf4d10fb/attachment.html
Join us at ClueCon 2016 Aug 8-12, 2016
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list