[Freeswitch-users] Fragmented IP protocol Issue with latest master and 1.4.4

Oleg Stolyar olegstolyar at gmail.com
Sat May 24 22:50:47 MSD 2014


Now I am thinking that the Fragmented IP may be a red herring since n the
old version it's also happening but only once.  Then the softphone
acknowledges it and that's the end of it.  Something in the OK message from
the current master prevents the softphone from acknowledging the OK
message.  I could not find significant differences in the OK message with
the old version that works.  The only difference seems to be *Min-SE:
120*header in the old version which is missing from the new one.

This is happening with at least two completely different softphone, so I
can't blame the phones :-)  It's 100% reproducible.

What else can I do to debug this?

Any help would be greatly appreciated!


On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Oleg Stolyar <olegstolyar at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I upgraded to the master (and it's also happening in 1.4.4).  I have some
> very long SIP addresses in my messages.  It used to work fine on the master
> from August 2013.  However, now when FS sends back the OK message, to
> invites with very long destination numbers, the originator softphone cannot
> receive it.  This is only happening with UDP.  TCP works fine.
>
> Here is a snapshot of wireshark for the master
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/0y0m4f4t4cgnwu0/Current%20Master.PNG
>
> And here is the snapshot of the same OK messages for the August 2013 FS
> that works
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/7wpsyw4r2skifpb/August%202013%20Version.PNG
>
> Any ideas how to fix this?  Is this a known issue?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20140524/72afe161/attachment.html 


Join us at ClueCon 2013 Aug 6-8, 2013
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list