[Freeswitch-users] mod_amr transcoing for testing purposes

Michael Jerris mike at jerris.com
Tue Jan 15 00:55:33 MSK 2013


I would NOT assume that the VoiceAge pool is complete.

On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:39 PM, Steven Ayre <steveayre at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ah, damn you're right Kristian!
> 
> The data sheet
> http://sangoma.com/assets/docs/datasheets/en/d100.pdf
> contains this footnode that is omitted from the web page:
> 
> "Except for AMR and AMR-WB. Integrators must clear patent license with
> VoiceAge Corp."
> 
> :(
> 
> In which case anyone obtaining licenses from VoiceAge Corp should be
> free to use them with any implementation...
> 
> I guess this is due to the same patent pool mess Mike mentioned?
> 
> -Steve
> 
> 
> On 14 January 2013 20:34, Steven Ayre <steveayre at gmail.com> wrote:
>> "All codecs are fully indemnified; no additional licensing is required
>> for their use."
>> Source: http://sangoma.com/products/media_processing/voice_transcoding_boards/d150.html
>> 
>> 
>> On 14 January 2013 19:58, Kristian Kielhofner <kris at kriskinc.com> wrote:
>>> IIRC Sangoma doesn't provide licensing for AMR and AMR-WB (just the
>>> implementation).
>>> 
>>> AFAIK mod_sangoma_codec is no more legal than libamr.




Join us at ClueCon 2011 Aug 9-11, 2011
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list