[Freeswitch-users] calls dropped after refer with replaces
michel.brabants at gmail.com
Tue Apr 23 18:16:26 MSD 2013
It was apparently because of hangup_after_bridge=true ... It would be nice
if it was integrated in the code to disable this in the
attented-transfer-scenario, but I'm searching for an "elegant" solution in
The other problem that I have is that the waiting call isn't retrieved, but
I'm looking into that.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org> wrote:
> You could report bugs to jira.freeswitch.org, this def. sounds like
> either build skew or a bug.
> Brian West
> brian at freeswitch.org
> FreeSWITCH Solutions, LLC
> PO BOX PO BOX 2531
> Brookfield, WI 53008-2531
> Twitter: @FreeSWITCH_Wire
> T: +1.918.420.9266 | F: +1.918.420.9267 | M: +1.918.424.WEST
> iNUM: +883 5100 1420 9266
> ISN: 410*543
> On Apr 23, 2013, at 6:02 AM, Michel Brabants <michel.brabants at gmail.com>
> > Hello,
> > when I send a refer with replaces from my polycom, the calls are dropped
> with which I'm trying to do an attended transfer. When leg arrives in
> CS_PARK and the other in CS_HIBERNATE. An unbridge happens afterwards on
> the leg that sent the refer-replaces, but in the end all legs are dropped.
> > Any idea why this could be happening? I tried to look at the sourcode,
> but I couldn't find my problem yet.
> > Thanks,
> > Michel
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
Join us at ClueCon 2011 Aug 9-11, 2011
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users