[Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch is responding to contact's port when client behind NAT
ifoundthetao at gmail.com
Thu Jun 7 22:25:52 MSD 2012
If this is urgent, you may want to look into commercial help.
The authors of FreeSWITCH offer commercial support, and there are others
on the list as well.
'We who cut mere stones must always be envisioning cathedrals.'
Quarry Worker's Creed
On 6/7/2012 12:56 PM, BELint Inc wrote:
> Does any one know its solutions,
> Guys please help, its urgent. I am even unable to register my phones :-(
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:20 AM, BELint Inc <belintinc at gmail.com
> <mailto:belintinc at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi All,
> We`ve been using freeswitch since very long, It was good all over
> but it got stuck to a simple yet complex situation. We have
> Yealink T28P series phones behind NAT and freeswitch is unable to
> get them register. In the scenario freeswitch is at public IP. The
> reason we think is that freeswitch is using sip port in contact
> header to respond to.
> Is there anyway we can avoid this or force it to always send the
> response to destination IP instead of contact or via header ports
> because clients are behind NAT and response can only reach them if
> it respond to destination IP & PORT.
> Please revert if someone know how to solve this problem. It is
> very urgent.
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> Join Us At ClueCon - Aug 7-9, 2012
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
Join us at ClueCon 2011 Aug 9-11, 2011
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users