[Freeswitch-users] continue_on_fail

[Boris Kovalenko]

Hello!

     No, the question was how to FAILOVER :) I need to stop processing 
dialstring if user at carrier1 is busy.

> the question was about mod_lcr.
> it returns something like:
>
> sofia/gateway/carrier1/14105780999|sofia/gateway/ 
> carrier2/14105780999|sofia/gateway/ carrier3/14105780999
> The question was how to make it when the first returns "user_busy" to not failover and try the other ones.
> -Avi
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Michael Collins <msc at freeswitch.org 
> <mailto:msc at freeswitch.org>> wrote:
>
>     Well, now we're talking about something more than just
>     continuing_on_fail. We'll need to look at the actual dialstring to
>     answer any more specific questions.
>
>     -MC
>
>
>     On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Avi Marcus <avi at avimarcus.net
>     <mailto:avi at avimarcus.net>> wrote:
>
>         It seems from testing, and I was told on channel:
>          continue_on_fail is per bridge string, not per leg. So it
>         doesn't actually help with the question..
>         Unless I'm mistaken.
>         -Avi
>
>
>         On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Michael Collins
>         <msc at freeswitch.org <mailto:msc at freeswitch.org>> wrote:
>
>             You will need to specify the error conditions on which to
>             continue. See the example here:
>             http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Channel_Variables#continue_on_fail
>
>             -MC
>
>             P.S. - Check out the "enumeration" column on this page to
>             get an idea of the kinds of failures you may not be aware
>             of: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Hangup_causes
>
>
>             On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Avi Marcus
>             <avi at avimarcus.net <mailto:avi at avimarcus.net>> wrote:
>
>                 I've been wondering how to do this.
>                 When I asked in channel, I was basically told this
>                 couldn't be done in a single bridge string... I hope
>                 that's not actually the case.
>                 -Avi
>
>
>                 On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Boris Kovalenko
>                 <boris at tagnet.ru <mailto:boris at tagnet.ru>> wrote:
>
>                     Hello!
>
>                         Have read docs but misundertood :( I use
>                     mod_lcr which return two
>                     or more gateways to the same destination. And when
>                     the user is busy with
>                     the first gateway the call continues with the
>                     second and so on. How may
>                     I to not continue gateways if user is busy?
>
>                     --
>                     ? ?????????,
>                       ????? ?????????
>                       ??? "??????"
>                       ???. +7 (3435) 230001
>                     <tel:%2B7%20%283435%29%20230001>
>                       ???? +7 (3435) 230005
>                     <tel:%2B7%20%283435%29%20230005>
>
>
>
>                     FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>                     FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>                     <mailto:FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
>                     http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>                     UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>                     http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
>
>                 FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>                 FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>                 <mailto:FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
>                 http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>                 UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>                 http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
>
>             FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>             FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>             <mailto:FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
>             http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>             UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>             http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
>
>         FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>         FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>         <mailto:FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
>         http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>         UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>         http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
>
>     FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>     FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>     <mailto:FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
>     http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>     UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>     http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org


-- 
Regards,
Boris


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20111011/cd1c909d/attachment-0001.html