[Freeswitch-users] Another: xml_curl vs Lua
saeedahmad1981 at gmail.com
Sun Jan 16 16:24:10 MSK 2011
i want to handle 2000 concurrent calls and minimum 100 cps.
possible with lua? or should i stay with xml_curl?
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Saeed Ahmed <saeedahmad1981 at gmail.com>wrote:
> Dear all,
> i know that lua is preferable by FS devs and community, but here i want to
> ask questions particular to my use case
> *1. Current Setup*
> *1.1 currently i am using xml_curl - for dialplan only
> 1.2 xml_curl.conf has two bindings so i am safe if first one dies
> 1.3 i am using apache + mono (.net) + mysql on another server (other than
> FS server)
> 1.4 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5420 @ 2.50GHz 8 core with 8 gm ram (for both
> FS and apache+mysql server)
> *2. Call Life Cycle*
> 2.1. call comes on internal profile
> 2.2. xml_curl ask xml from webserver
> 2.3 i do database query for each call and, return back possible supplier(s)
> based on dialed number and customer id
> 2.4 i return xml to bridge the call on external profile
> Questiosn & Concerns:
> 1. So with above setup i am not able to reach more than 60 cps (most
> probably issue with my xml_curl backend), so i am thinking to try LUA
> 2. but one point is clicking my mind that, in case of xml_curl the
> webserver can be on external server, and xml_curl conf could have primary
> and backup binding, can i achieve that in LUA too?
> 3. Is LUA still be usefull as i am not doing any ivr etc.. its just xml
> conf which i have to return.
> 4. xml_curl based setup has good feature that i can serve more FS servers,
> can i also do it in LUA?
> Please ask me if i miss some information
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users