[Freeswitch-users] serious problem in record_session

[Rob Morin]

Requiring 2*n g729 licenses because of the way it is built into the
conference is exactly the point. I'm wondering, is there legally a way to
alter the implementation such that n+1 is the proper number of licenses?
Would creating a "phantom channel" for the recording achieve that?

Just a thought,
Rob

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian West [mailto:brian at freeswitch.org] 
Sent: 09/29/2010 5:27 PM
To: FreeSWITCH Users Help
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] serious problem in record_session

You know recording is built into the conference itself.

/b

On Sep 29, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Rob Morin wrote:

> Two items, one for John, and one for the community:
> 
> 1. Did you (John) ever get this working?
> 
> 2. There has been discussion that if the calls are g729, that 2*n 
> licenses are required (where n is the number of legs on a conference 
> call). Would it be possible, and legal, to use an implementation such 
> as this to create an extension that gets recorded such that the number 
> of licenses required to record a conference call would be n+1, rather than
n*2?
> 
> Thank you,
> Rob Morin