[Freeswitch-users] Ubuntu Hi-Res timer - small world

[lloyd thomas]

I have completed the rebuild of my ubuntu freeswitch box and recompiled with
tickless switched off and timer set to 1000Hz
I am now running Lucid 2.6.32.15+drm33.5tch-freeswitch
Idle uses 2% CPU load. Idle with freeswitch running gives 12% cpu load. I
get a spike up to 20% on call setup and then call reverts to using around
12-13%. Calling music on hold seems to use a couple of % more.
I suspect for the lowly hardware I have it on, this is acceptable for
running a few extensions.
Can I do anything to further reduce the cpu load?

On 2 September 2010 10:39, lloyd thomas <lloydie.t at gmail.com> wrote:

> Damn thing blew up anyway. Bad HD sectors.
> rebuilding with Lucid 2.6.32-24-generic-pae
>
>
> On 31 August 2010 22:39, William King <quentusrex at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Which release?
>>
>> On 08/31/2010 02:33 PM, lloyd thomas wrote:
>> > 32 bit
>> >
>> > On 31 August 2010 22:32, lloyd thomas <lloydie.t at gmail.com
>> > <mailto:lloydie.t at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     I am running 2.6.28.10-freeswitch
>> >
>> >
>> >     On 31 August 2010 22:05, William King <quentusrex at gmail.com
>> >     <mailto:quentusrex at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >         I am running this kernel in production and seems to be very
>> stable:
>> >         2.6.32-24-server x86_64 GNU/Linux
>> >
>> >         Using release 10.04.1 LTS
>> >
>> >         -William King
>> >
>> >         On 08/31/2010 01:58 PM, Jean-Yves F. Barbier wrote:
>> >         > On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:37:04 -0700, William King
>> >         <quentusrex at gmail.com <mailto:quentusrex at gmail.com>>
>> >         > wrote:
>> >         >
>> >         > Yep, I confirm, 2.6.35 line seems to have timing PBs (and
>> others),
>> >         > 2.6.33.4 is more stable (ubuntu often thinks newer is
>> better...)
>> >         >
>> >         >> Which release of Ubuntu are you running? I have FS running on
>> >         a very old
>> >         >> machine(slower than yours) and I have seen an issue like this
>> >         before. It
>> >         >> was related to the release and the kernel.
>> >         >
>> >
>> >         _______________________________________________
>> >         FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> >         FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> >         <mailto:FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
>> >         http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> >         UNSUBSCRIBE:
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> >         http://www.freeswitch.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> > UNSUBSCRIBE:
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> > http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100903/8b727112/attachment.html