[Freeswitch-users] T.38 and Audiocodes or Patton gateway
Tim St. Pierre
fs-list at communicatefreely.net
Mon Nov 22 16:13:58 PST 2010
>>> Is your Audiocode's ECM support badly broken? Spandsp's T.38 terminal
>>> and gateway engines have been tested with numerous systems, and ECM is
>>> normally OK unless the other system does something stupid - which
>>> unfortunately a number of T.38 implementations still do.
It might be, although it doesn't work with it turned off either. These gateways have been in use
for about a year, going through Asterisk to a SIP trunking provider that uses Metaswitch, and for
the most part, they work well. It's when I terminate the call to Freeswitch and SpanDSP that
problems arise, but only with this device. I'm waiting to get one back from a customer, then I can
do a proper A-B comparison using wireshark.
> When ITSPs recommend turning off ECM, its just an admission of failure.
> They are accepting that the networks are so poor they are unlikely to
> get a 100% correct result, even after the permitted number of retries.
> In other words, they are accepting that FAXes with numerous errors, like
> we had in the bad old days before ECM, are the bold new standard for
> service quality in the internet era. Wonderful, isn't it.
ECM is there for a reason. Our upstream carriers are great (otherwise we would choose someone
else), but most of our customers are connecting over unmanaged DSL links, so there are going to be a
few glitches. Testing with my own fax machine, ECM off usually ends up with a few bad lines, but
ECM on gives me clean faxes every time.
A lot can be said for machines too. 99% of the "half my faxes fail" calls come from customers with
HP all-in-one machines. I have an old brother fax machine that someone was throwing away. If I set
it up at the same customer site, they can fax without problems. That usually convinces them to buy
a new fax machine.
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list