[Freeswitch-users] freeswitch to cisco gateway
anthony.minessale at gmail.com
Wed Mar 17 10:01:46 PDT 2010
We don't really care what he does with the code.
But if he expects us to help him with a forked tree, it's not going to
We expect people who make any meaningful changes to the FS core to be wise
enough to work with
us to keep the code in tree so the community can continue to maintain it and
so it can grow with the rest of the
The GPL license is a whole different topic I will avoid at the moment.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Madovsky <infos at madovsky.org> wrote:
> So why not GPL or Gnu Affero public licence ?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian West" <brian at freeswitch.org>
> To: <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 9:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] freeswitch to cisco gateway
> > This is where it gets hairy... Yes the MPL says you have to share your
> > modifications with the original author but as far as I can tell you don't
> > have to distribute to cause this clause to go into effect.
> > Its like this:
> > You change switch_ivr_originate.c, you HAVE to share those changes with
> > Anthony.
> > You create your own mod_kewlshit.c, its yours to do with what you want
> > you don't have to share.
> > You change any code that is included with the download YOU MUST share
> > the original author.
> > /b
> > On Mar 16, 2010, at 11:30 PM, jay binks wrote:
> >> Im not on the FS dev team, but I think you may be a little mistaken.
> >> generally your free to make modifications to open source code ( for
> >> internal use )
> >> however its when you distribute the resultant product, then you have
> >> to make the source available..
> >> if your only using it in-house, I dont believe your required to
> >> contribute the code back.
> >> ( however your going to end up having issues maintaining your patch
> >> set over a long period.. like can be seen here )
> >> see here :
> >>> must be made available in Source Code form under the terms of this
> >>> License either on the
> >>> same media as an Executable version
> >> if your not distributing your executable to any 3rd parties... then I
> >> dont believe you have to distribute the modified source..
> >> Correct me if Im wrong though guys...
> >> Jay
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> >> UNSUBSCRIBE:
> >> http://www.freeswitch.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > http://www.freeswitch.org
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
Anthony Minessale II
MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com <MSN%3Aanthony_minessale at hotmail.com>
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com<PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale at gmail.com>
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org <sip%3A888 at conference.freeswitch.org>
iax:guest at conference.freeswitch.org/888
googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org<googletalk%3Aconf%2B888 at conference.freeswitch.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users