[Freeswitch-users] SILK Codec
dujinfang at gmail.com
Tue Mar 9 21:37:57 PST 2010
I only tested 8000 because at least one leg is PSTN or SIP UA which
doesn't support SILK and CELT in our scenario. We are bridging UAs
between US and China so robustness is more concerned than HZ.
I just *feel* it's ok because I only tested with my ear without
considerate packet lost or jitter.
2010/3/10 Jason White <jason at jasonjgw.net>:
> Seven Du <dujinfang at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I tested on servers running Ubuntu 8.04 64bit and Ubuntu 7.10 32bit.
>> One running trunk. and back ported to another server running rev14696.
>> Sounds great.
> Do you have a comparison with my current favourite, CELT at 48000? CELT at 32000
> also gives high quality, in my opinion.
> I plan to test the SILK module at some point, possibly later this week.
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users