[Freeswitch-users] Dialplan failover question

Sergey Okhapkin sos at sokhapkin.dyndns.org
Wed Jun 23 05:20:30 PDT 2010


I prefer the first way, it allows to set leg A channel variables to different 
values depending on which gateway completed the call.

On Wednesday 23 June 2010, DJB International wrote:
> It's always confused me.  I wonder whether there are any differences
>  between these 2 dialplans.
> 
> <extension name="test1">
>   <condition field="destination_number" expression="^(.*)$">
>     <action application="set" data="hangup_after_bridge=true"/>
>     <action application="set" data="continue_on_fail=true"/>
>     <action application="bridge" data="sofia/gateway/carrier1/$1"/>
>     <action application="bridge" data="sofia/gateway/carrier2/$1"/>
>   </condition>
> </extension>
> 
> -and-
> 
> <extension name="test2">
>   <condition field="destination_number" expression="^(.*)$">
>     <action application="set" data="hangup_after_bridge=true"/>
>     <action application="set" data="continue_on_fail=true"/>
>     <action application="bridge"
> data="sofia/gateway/carrier1/$1|sofia/gateway/carrier2/$1"/>
>   </condition>
> </extension>
> 
> What is the best way to use it?
> 
> Thank you,
> Dorn B.
> 




More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list