[Freeswitch-users] 100 parallel calls not possible (Performance problems)

[Daniel Neubert]

We've not load-tested / stress-tested our platform setup, yet - but we 
will do this in a few weeks.

Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Daniel


On 28.07.2010 11:35, Durmuş Ali Öztürk wrote:
> Hallo Daniel,
>
> Yes, I have increased the value to 100.
>
> What are your limits and which system/platform do you use?
>
> MfG
> Ali
>
> 2010/7/28 Daniel Neubert <daniel.neubert at solomo.de 
> <mailto:daniel.neubert at solomo.de>>
>
>     Hi,
>
>     have you checked your switch.conf.xml configuration for
>     "sessions-per-second" value?
>
>     <param name="sessions-per-second" value="30"/>
>
>     Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
>     Daniel Neubert
>
>          
>
>     On 28.07.2010 08:54, Durmuş Ali Öztürk wrote:
>>     I will try to set up a fs system on CentOS, maybe the performance
>>     will be better.
>>
>>     I am sorry but I dont understand the difference between cps and
>>     number of active session.
>>
>>     If fs has 10 active sessions (with media), then the call per
>>     second should be 10 too??
>>
>>     2010/7/28 Phillip Jones-2 [via freeswitch-users] <[hidden email]
>>     <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5345283&i=0>>
>>
>>         >> The compiler flag is not found in my solution, should I
>>         get the latest source
>>         code
>>
>>         That would seem like a reasonable thing to do.....
>>
>>         >> In case of a timing problem, why it does not occured while
>>         calling parallel
>>         30 number?
>>
>>         In my (limited) experience there are two important things to
>>         control:
>>
>>         1) call per second
>>         2) Total number of active sessions
>>
>>         Calls per seconds appears (to me) to have a greater effect on
>>         the CPU. So at 1 call per second I would be looking at your
>>         CPU utilization and if it is maxing out then reducing that rate.
>>
>>         My point being here that your box *may* be capable of
>>         handling 100 or 1000 sessions, if the cps is lowered.
>>
>>         HTH
>>
>>         On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Durmuş Ali Öztürk <[hidden
>>         email]
>>         <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5344088&i=0>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>             The compiler flag is not found in my solution, should I
>>             get the latest source
>>             code?
>>
>>             In case of a timing problem, why it does not occured
>>             while calling parallel
>>             30 number?
>>             --
>>             View this message in context:
>>             http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/100-parallel-calls-not-possible-Performance-problems-tp5339029p5340996.html
>>             <http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/100-parallel-calls-not-possible-Performance-problems-tp5339029p5340996.html?by-user=t&by-user=t>
>>             Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at
>>             Nabble.com.
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>             [hidden email]
>>             <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5344088&i=1>
>>
>>             http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>             UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>             http://www.freeswitch.org
>>             <http://www.freeswitch.org?by-user=t&by-user=t>
>>
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>         [hidden email]
>>         <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5344088&i=2>
>>         http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>         UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>         http://www.freeswitch.org
>>         <http://www.freeswitch.org?by-user=t&by-user=t&by-user=t>
>>
>>
>>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>         View message @
>>         http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/100-parallel-calls-not-possible-Performance-problems-tp5339029p5344088.html
>>         <http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/100-parallel-calls-not-possible-Performance-problems-tp5339029p5344088.html?by-user=t>
>>
>>         To unsubscribe from Re: 100 parallel calls not possible
>>         (Performance problems), click here.
>>
>>
>>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     View this message in context: Re: 100 parallel calls not possible
>>     (Performance problems)
>>     <http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/100-parallel-calls-not-possible-Performance-problems-tp5339029p5345283.html>
>>
>>
>>     Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive
>>     <http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/> at Nabble.com.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100728/85694ecb/attachment-0001.html