[Freeswitch-users] memory leak

[Rupa Schomaker]

Doesn't that look like a pool that isn't being destroyed?

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Rupa Schomaker<rupa at rupa.com> wrote:
> Worst offenders (leakers over 100K).  The last one is the worst (672M)
> -- looks like a lua script.  What are you doing in lua again?
> ==28624== 672,268,288 bytes in 82,064 blocks are still reachable in
> loss record 529 of 529
> ==28624==    at 0x4022AB8: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
> ==28624==    by 0x410BB2F: apr_pool_create_ex (apr_pools.c:300)
> ==28624==    by 0x4111176: apr_thread_create (thread.c:171)
> ==28624==    by 0x4080878: switch_thread_create (switch_apr.c:631)
> ==28624==    by 0x6C278E9: lua_thread (mod_lua.cpp:372)
> ==28624==    by 0x6C27948: ??? (mod_lua.cpp:407)
> ==28624==    by 0x40AADFC: switch_api_execute (switch_loadable_module.c:1567)
> ==28624==    by 0x583A7FC: ??? (mod_commands.c:2426)
> ==28624==    by 0x40A8881: switch_scheduler_execute (switch_scheduler.c:61)
> ==28624==    by 0x40A8DE0: task_thread_loop (switch_scheduler.c:127)
> ==28624==    by 0x40A8EA3: switch_scheduler_task_thread (switch_scheduler.c:168)
> ==28624==    by 0x4110E05: dummy_worker (thread.c:138)
> ==28624==
> ==28624== LEAK SUMMARY:
> ==28624==    definitely lost: 63,113,740 bytes in 1,690,880 blocks.
> ==28624==    indirectly lost: 35,632 bytes in 491 blocks.
> ==28624==      possibly lost: 645,758 bytes in 9,150 blocks.
> ==28624==    still reachable: 681,849,684 bytes in 113,077 blocks.
> ==28624==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.

-- 
-Rupa