[Freeswitch-users] Confusing handling of incoming calls

[Rupa Schomaker]

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Pete Mueller <pete at privateconnect.com>wrote:

> 0) Rupa, you are absolutely right, I forgot that.  ports was never an issue
> because previous gateways all REGISTERed. I will have to swap my ports
> around as bandwidth is not flexible.
>

You can't tell bandwidth.com to use port 5080?

>
> 1) I thought of this, but I have hundreds of DID, (around 600 at the
> moment) and maintaining that mapping in the dialplan would be a mess.  AFTER
> I know what gateway the call arrived on, I have a database for each gateway
> that helps me process from there.
>

You have cases where the same DID maps differently for one gateway or
another?  If not, why is the gateway part of the database query?

>
> 2) Yes, separate profiles would work, but does sound gross.  I'm going to
> swap my ports around and see if that clears things up...
>
> -pete
>
>  -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Confusing handling of incoming calls
> From: Rupa Schomaker <rupa at rupa.com>
> Date: Wed, July 22, 2009 2:12 am
> To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Pete Mueller <pete at privateconnect.com>wrote:
>
>> My goal is:
>> 0) figure out why the bandwidth gateway is being processed as "internal"
>> (this is more of a security thing)
>>
>
> they are probably terminating traffic on port 5060 rather than 5080.  5060
> is internal, 5080 is external.
>
>
>>
>> 1) have both gateways enter at the same point in the dialplan (this seems
>> to be the purpose of the "Extension" param)
>>
>
> I'd drop the extension param and instead match on the destination_number
> (the DID used to reach you).
>
>
>> 2) be able to identify which gateway the call came in on. I was hoping to
>> set a param in the gateway configuration that would be passed through onto
>> the channel, but have not found one.  Worst case, I could have each gateway
>> enter at a different extension in the dialplan, however, that doesn't seem
>> to be working if the channel comes in the "internal" profile.
>>
>
> Not sure here...  gateways are an outbound thing.  Inbound calls just hit
> your dialplan and you process from there.  A sledgehammer approach would be
> to have a different sip_profile for each gateway.  But that is just silly.
> Flowroute at least puts their name in the sdp....
>
>
>> Thanks for your help.  I've provided INFO dumps from both gateways if they
>> help...
>> -pete
>>
>
>
> --
> -Rupa
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>


-- 
-Rupa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20090722/0e3267c6/attachment-0001.html