[Freeswitch-users] Setting P-Asserted-ID to something other than the callerid

[Ken Rice]

That's just right down screwing with the standards...

PAID is the caller id... This particular definition is from the RFCs and
3GPP docs for IMS which is why we have standardized P- headers...

Can your vendor not look at the P-Charging-Vector field?

Also, From when used with PAID is more like an ANI not a CLID


> From: Dale <fdhege at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:30:34 -0400
> To: <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Setting P-Asserted-ID to something other than the
> callerid
> 
> 
> Hello again,
> 
> I wanted to first say thanks to Brain for helping me fix my from
> domain issue the other day. It helped quite a bit.
> 
> Now with more testing and talking with the vendor (please don't shoot
> the messenger :) )
> 
> They want the caller id info in the from and the charge number/
> screening number in the P-Asserted-ID.
> 
> I have tested this and verified that this does work like they say it
> does by setting the callerid number to my charge number and setting
> the from user in the gateway config to the callerid I want displayed.
> But this solution doesn't scale very well.
> 
> I know I can set the gateway option caller-id-in-from to get that part
> done. But is there a way to set the P-Asserted-ID to something other
> than the callerid?
> 
> Any hints would be welcomed.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Dale
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org