[Freeswitch-users] Local call uses public context?
larclap at yahoo.com
Thu Dec 24 08:16:53 PST 2009
Please forgive my slowness, but I'm still having problems with this. When
you say that I "really didn't auth the user", did you mean the
If you did, I upped to svn1 16055 and placed a cidr attribute on the
extension and reran the test, resulting in the same output, going to context
Further, I'm confused about your response about ACL compared with Billy W in
an email of 12/22/2009.
".you could simply put these entries in your internal sofia profile.
<param name="apply-inbound-acl" value="192.168.0.0/24"/> <param
In that case, you do not need to include anything in the directory. The
cidr entries in the directory are for providing additional control for each
user id and what IPs they are allowed to make calls from."
Linux fs 2.6.18-128.1.10.el5 #1 SMP Thu May 7 10:39:21 EDT 2009 i686 i686
From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Brian
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 6:03 PM
To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Local call uses public context?
2009-12-23 15:00:01.955357 [DEBUG] sofia.c:5322 IP 192.168.10.105 Approved
by acl "192.168.10.0/24". Access Granted.
Because the context is set on the profile as public... and you really didn't
auth the user so user_context was never set.
On Dec 23, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Lars Zeb wrote:
I am trying to setup a second FS box from scratch using v16048.
What can cause a local call (81002, or 9996) to use context public? It's a
standard vanilla install.
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users