[Freeswitch-users] no hang-up on B leg

[Nik Middleton]

I would have tended to agree with the glare, however, before I killed
both sides, I was back to my issue of the call not clearing down at all.
(rtp timeout eventually does it)

 

Thanks for the pointer to the source.

 

Regards,

 

________________________________

From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of
Michael Jerris
Sent: 09 December 2009 14:01
To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] no hang-up on B leg

 

src/switch_ivr_bridge.c

 

This could just as well be a glare condition when the call is in process
of tearing down.

 

Mike

 

 

On Dec 8, 2009, at 6:48 PM, Nik Middleton wrote:





No doubt, but that's a little difficult as this only happens
occasionally and I have 200 calls going on at the time.  It's needle in
the haystack stuff.

 

Here's what I know.

 

I have an external process listening for DTMF events.  If I detect '*' I
do a kill uuid on the B leg.  On a number of occasions I get an error
saying the B leg doesn't exist, so I now do a double kill on the
associated leg which I get from the event.  I do not get a 'doesn't
exist' message for the A leg, which leads me to believe that process of
tearing down both bridged legs is flawed.

 

The kluge clears the B leg hang issue, so the pressure's off for me, but
when I get a few nano seconds, I'll look at the code to see if there's
anything obvious.

 

Can anyone give me a hint on what module handles bridged calls? (sorry,
being lazy and suffering from a lack of sleep)

 

Regards,

 

________________________________

From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of
Michael Jerris
Sent: 08 December 2009 16:16
To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] no hangup on B leg

 

We will really need debug logs and sip traces to be able to figure out
what exactly is going on here.

 

Mike

 

On Dec 7, 2009, at 4:06 PM, Nik Middleton wrote:






Sorry no, apart from the fact that I was seeing the hangup.

 

 

I'm wondering if this a bandwidth congestion issue.  Is there anyway on
a bridged call I could trap on dtmf like look for '*' and force a
hangup?  I don't seem to able to see this tone on the B leg though.

 

Regards,

________________________________

From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of
Michael Collins
Sent: 07 December 2009 19:12
To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] no hangup on B leg

 

 

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Nik Middleton
<nik.middleton at noblesolutions.co.uk> wrote:

Hi all,

 

I'll slowly pulling my hair out on this one.  I had FS successfully
hanging up both legs on a bridge, now today, with nothing changed, I'm
not seeing a hangup of the b leg at all.

 

FS is behind a PIX, so it might be a weird NAT issue, but A leg calls
hangup just fine.  Before when I had an issue with the B leg not closing
the bridge, I was at least getting a hangup event, now it's not being
fired.  Does anyone have an idea what might be causing this?

 

Regards,

 

Time for SIP traces and debug logs. Also, do you have any logs from when
things seemed to be working so that you can compare?
-MC

 

_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org



 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20091209/e391ec1a/attachment-0002.html