[Freeswitch-users] FS failover redundancy & load balancing

Even André Fiskvik grevenx at me.com
Fri Apr 3 15:48:00 PDT 2009


Where do you guys read that it's in alpha?
On the opensips.org they proclaim OpenSips 1.5 released,
with that module being one of the new features. I don't see any  
mention of it being alpha/beta functionality?

Best regards,
Even André

On 4. april. 2009, at 00.30, Pablo Hernan Saro wrote:

> Hi Kristian, you're right. Definitively that will be best solution  
> as soon as it's released as stable (it's alpha now).
> http://www.opensips.org/index.php?n=Resources.DocsTutLoadbalancing
>
> Pablo
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Kristian Kielhofner <kristian.kielhofner at gmail.com 
> > wrote:
> You could try (although it's somewhat bleeding edge) to use OpenSIPS
> 1.5 with load_balancer (not heavily tested, btw) in front of some
> FreeSWITCH machines:
>
> http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/devel/load_balancer.html
>
> 2009/4/2 Ashley van Gerven <ashley.ohq at gmail.com>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I can't find much info on setting up a redundant or heavy load  
> FreeSwitch
> > implementation. Are there any
> > links apart from: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Enterprise_deployment 
>  ?
> >
> > I imagine the entry level solution is to have two FS boxes  
> configured
> > identitcally, with
> > redundant SBC software (recommendations?) in front, passing the  
> calls to the
> > primary FS box,
> > or the backup FS box if the primary is not responding. Is that the  
> easiest
> > solution?
> >
> > What about a situation of having a level of concurrent calls  
> beyond what one
> > FS box can handle? I realise
> > that would be a very large number of concurrent calls, but we  
> would need a
> > good plan on how to scale the
> > systems.
> >
> > Are there recommendations for load balancing solutions? Either  
> soft or
> > hardware?
> >
> > My guess would be having 3 + 1 spare FS servers would work, where  
> calls are
> > distributed accross 3 FS boxes
> > by a load balancer with one spare in event of failure.
> >
> > Also how would a FS box at max capacity behave? Does FS monitor  
> available
> > resources and reject the
> > excess calls that it can't handle? Or would the load balancer have  
> to be
> > configured with the maximum number
> > of calls per box?
> >
> > Would love to hear some experiences of deploying FS with failover  
> & high
> > load.
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Ash
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freeswitch-users mailing list
> > Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > http://www.freeswitch.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Kristian Kielhofner
> http://blog.krisk.org
> http://www.submityoursip.com
> http://www.astlinux.org
> http://www.star2star.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20090404/36d7c009/attachment-0002.html 


More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list