[Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH in production

Michael Collins mcollins at fcnetwork.com
Wed Feb 13 13:31:31 PST 2008


Claudio,

Join IRC (irc.freenode.net/freeswitch) and look for a user named "SwK" -
he's making 2.5 million calls per day with hundreds of cps.  He can give
you a good first-hand report on how well FS works in a high traffic
environment.

-MC

> -----Original Message-----
> From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-
> users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Cavalera Claudio
Luigi
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 9:20 AM
> To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH in production
> 
> freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org wrote:
> > Hi Claudio,
> >
> >> in my view fs seems a very promising project, especially if it will
> >> scale better than asterisk, but it still seems very young.
> >> I would like to understand if someone is actually using fs in
> >> production configurations. I don't think so as I've seen an email
> >> announcing release candidate 1 some time ago.
> >
> > We're running Freeswitch in production, and I'm aware of a number of
> > companies that have deployed it in very large configurations (many
> > having replaced existing Asterisk installations).
> 
> Can you give me an order of magnitude of the number of pure voip calls
> without transcoding?
> Something like 10 000 concurrent calls?
> I already love the idea of a freeswitch cluster. :-)
> 
> > I imagine your view of it being a "very young" project is based on
the
> > documentation currently available. I think Freeswitch requires more
> > than a passing familiarity with telephony, and doesn't give you
quite
> > as much hand-holding as Asterisk at present.
> 
> Documentation was not the reason of my view (I don't consider asterisk
> doc particularly good anyway).
> My view was mainly because of the first release still approaching
> (Freeswitch Release Candidate 1), being a slackware linux lover I got
> used to stability concerns.
> However I understand that freeswitch at the moment could be more
robust
> than asterisk despite the release number (some people restart asterisk
> on production environments over time, just in case ;-).
> 
> Thanks!
> Claudio
> 
> 
> Internet Email Confidentiality Footer
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ---------------------------
> La presente comunicazione, con le informazioni in essa contenute e
ogni
> documento o file allegato, e' rivolta unicamente alla/e persona/e cui
e'
> indirizzata ed alle altre da questa autorizzata/e a riceverla. Se non
> siete i destinatari/autorizzati siete avvisati che qualsiasi azione,
> copia, comunicazione, divulgazione o simili basate sul contenuto di
tali
> informazioni e' vietata e potrebbe essere contro la legge (art. 616
C.P.,
> D.Lgs n. 196/2003 Codice in materia di protezione dei dati personali).
Se
> avete ricevuto questa comunicazione per errore, vi preghiamo di darne
> immediata notizia al mittente e di distruggere il messaggio originale
e
> ogni file allegato senza farne copia alcuna o riprodurne in alcun modo
il
> contenuto.
> 
> This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the addressee(s) only
and
> are confidential and/or may contain legally privileged information. If
you
> have received this message by mistake or are not one of the addressees
> above, you may take no action based on it, and you may not copy or
show it
> to anyone; please reply to this e-mail and point out the error which
has
> occurred.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ---------------------------
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org




More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list