[Freeswitch-users] Javascript input

Anthony Minessale anthmct at yahoo.com
Thu Aug 9 13:22:23 PDT 2007

That would make no sense because it is totally unreasonable to assume that everyone wants that behavior.  Why does *your* preference deserve to be the default behavior instead of mine?  If you need monolithic narrow minded approaches to ivr code I can recommend something else for you.
Anthony Minessale II

FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/

AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com
JABBER:anthony.minessale at gmail.com
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org
iax:guest at conference.freeswitch.org/888
googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org

----- Original Message ----
From: Jonas Gauffin <jonas.gauffin at gmail.com>
To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2007 10:45:58 AM
Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Javascript input


I would like to have a change in the way that DTMF input are being used.

It would be much nicer if records and playing phrases are per default
aborted if a DTMF is pressed. This behavior should be overridden if
recordFile and streamFile have got a callback specified (which handles
if a DTMF should stops the recording/phrase or not).

I think that the most usual case is that DTMF aborts both recordings
and phrases, and it should therefore be the most easy alternative to
use. Right now, one have to use callbacks (which requires a lot more
work) to get the most common behavior.


Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org

Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20070809/01030a74/attachment-0002.html 

More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list